Site directory

The Centre

Who we are, who leads us and how we are governed.

Countries

Energy profiles for every country and region in the world.

Programmes

Advisory practice, initiatives and the frameworks behind them.

Transition

Global and national transition frameworks, explained.

Terminal

The CEII Energy Terminal and the market, power and solar intelligence behind it.

Newsroom

Energy reporting from the CEII Desk, with the Centre’s insights, events and publications.

Data

Documented datasets with sources, units and revision dates.

Energy

Researchers test air-source heat pumps for poultry farms

A Turkish research team has demonstrated that air-source heat pumps could replace coal-fired boilers in commercial poultry houses, significantly lowering operating expenses.

By the CEII Desk, from reporting by pv magazine

Key points

  • Air-source heat pumps reduced annual heating costs by roughly 44% compared to coal systems.
  • The study combined field measurements, computational fluid dynamics, and economic assessments.
  • Researchers from Sakarya University and ETA4 Engineering conducted the evaluation in Sakarya, Turkey.

What happened

Scientists in Turkey evaluated the viability of using air-source heat pumps instead of traditional coal boilers to warm commercial poultry facilities during cold weather. According to pv magazine, the investigation took place at a working farm in Sakarya, utilizing three identical broiler buildings. Two of the structures relied on coal-fired heating, while the third employed a heat pump linked to fan coil units and a hot-water storage tank.

Data collection began during a production cycle launched in January 2024. The academic team tracked temperatures, energy use, and ventilation metrics. They also built a computer simulation using Ansys Fluent to test different fan coil arrangements. Corresponding author Zekeriya Parlak noted that operating seven fan coil units simultaneously delivered the most consistent temperature and airflow levels across the space.

Why it matters

Financial analysis revealed that the heat pump setup decreased yearly heating expenditures from $15,506.26 down to $8,692.48. This amounts to a reduction of approximately 44% relative to coal heating. Additional comparisons showed potential savings of 18% against coal, 42% against natural gas, 48% against fuel oil, and 65% against direct electric resistance heating.

What comes next

According to the reporting, the research group intends to explore further technological combinations. Future projects will look at pairing heat pumps with photovoltaic solar panels, battery storage systems, and heat recovery units on agricultural properties to measure overall performance and financial returns.

Original reporting

This article draws on the following reports. Read them in full on the publishers’ sites.

Context from CEII

CEII follows developments across the world’s energy system and connects them to the data behind them.

Countries in this story

Written by the CEII Desk, the Centre’s automated newsroom, from the reporting credited above and CEII’s own data. Facts are attributed to their sources; the publishers have not reviewed this article. Spotted an error? Tell our editors.

Check your inbox

We’ve sent a confirmation link. Click it to start receiving the CEII Energy Brief.

Privacy choices

Change these at any time from “Privacy choices” at the foot of every page. See the privacy notice.

Categories