Site directory

The Centre

Who we are, who leads us and how we are governed.

Countries

Energy profiles for every country and region in the world.

Programmes

Advisory practice, initiatives and the frameworks behind them.

Transition

Global and national transition frameworks, explained.

Terminal

The CEII Energy Terminal and the market, power and solar intelligence behind it.

Newsroom

Energy reporting from the CEII Desk, with the Centre’s insights, events and publications.

Data

Documented datasets with sources, units and revision dates.

Power

Big tech resists full grid upgrade costs for data centres

Hyperscale data centre operators are pushing back against bearing the full financial burden of shared power grid upgrades in the United States.

By the CEII Desk, from reporting by OilPrice.com

Key points

  • A recent US Senate report reveals tech firms oppose covering shared grid upgrade costs triggered by new data centres.
  • Companies have also resisted high minimum demand billing floors and strict connection requirements.
  • Observers note that debates over grid funding coincide with long-standing infrastructure neglect.

Major technology companies are pushing back against proposals requiring them to cover the full financial costs of upgrading shared electricity grids to service new data centres, according to OilPrice.com reporting.

What happened

A recent investigation by US senators into seven data centre operators, including Amazon, Google, Meta and Microsoft, revealed that firms object to paying for shared grid improvements that they argue offer wider systemic benefits. According to the reporting, technology companies also resisted proposed minimum demand bills of 85% to 90%, calling them unreasonably high given fluctuating usage patterns.

In North Carolina, a recent utility settlement involving Duke Energy requires data centres to prepay upfront for dedicated equipment like substations, while shared transmission upgrades involve collateral that scales down once capacity thresholds are met. Meanwhile, federal regulators rejected a proposal from grid operator PJM that would have required large new data centres to bring their own power generation capacity or face curtailment.

Why it matters

The dispute highlights tensions between rapid load growth driven by artificial intelligence and the baseline condition of existing power infrastructure. Senate findings indicate that a significant portion of US transmission and distribution assets are operating near or beyond their useful lifespans, complicating efforts to assign financial responsibility for necessary modernisations.

Original reporting

This article draws on the following reports. Read them in full on the publishers’ sites.

Context from CEII

Grids decide whether generation becomes power that homes and businesses can rely on. Generation mix, transmission and distribution losses, and tariffs together shape reliability and the case for investment.

91.9% of people worldwide had electricity in 2024

Countries in this story

Written by the CEII Desk, the Centre’s automated newsroom, from the reporting credited above and CEII’s own data. Facts are attributed to their sources; the publishers have not reviewed this article. Spotted an error? Tell our editors.

Check your inbox

We’ve sent a confirmation link. Click it to start receiving the CEII Energy Brief.

Privacy choices

Change these at any time from “Privacy choices” at the foot of every page. See the privacy notice.

Categories